Lifecycle assessment (LCA) for the circular economy

16th Sep 2024

Lifecycle assessment (LCA) is a systematic approach that enhances understanding of sustainability performance and its potential improvement and facilitates a circular economy. This is a key area of focus for meeting sustainability targets in the construction sector.
Definitions:

  • LCA evaluates environmental impacts of buildings and infrastructure from cradle to grave by determining the best performing solutions to achieve sustainability goals.
  • A circular economy focuses on resource reuse and minimising waste and pollution by circulating products and materials and regenerating nature.
hero about alt

Benefits of lifecycle assessment and circular economy

Reduced environmental footprint

Lifecycle assessment is emerging as the most effective approach for developers to measure and reduce the environmental impact of their buildings. A RIBA Journal article cites research that claims almost 75% of UK construction professionals believe a minimum 10% reduction in carbon emissions is possible on projects that carry out lifecycle assessments.

Another recent article claims that while LCA can evaluate environmental impacts, the results do not necessarily indicate how circular a solution is. Measuring the circularity of resources and material flows fills this gap to reduce a building’s environmental footprint.

Conserved resources

A circular economy supported by LCA optimises resources and reduces waste by identifying areas where materials can be circulated and conserved. According to the Ellen Macarthur Foundation, a charity committed to creating a circular economy: ‘A circular economy favours activities that preserve value in the form of energy, labour and materials. This means designing for durability, reuse, remanufacturing, and recycling to keep products, components, and materials circulating in the economy.

Promotes sustainable construction practices

LCA now has a role in shaping policy and regulations for sustainable construction. According to a recent research paper, LCA supports sustainable design and decision-making processes. It promotes the selection of materials that have a lower overall environmental impact.

In calling for new standards on the environmental impact of construction materials, a University of Manchester policy paper has included life cycle assessment as a policy recommendation for decarbonising the building sector.

UK Adoption of LCA and circular economy

Lifecycle assessment and circular economy methodologies are increasingly used in project planning UK construction projects.

Green building certification programmes like LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) increasingly include credits or incentives for conducting life cycle assessment studies to instil sustainable construction practices. More software packages that manage LCA are coming to market to enhance construction efficiencies.

Challenges of LCA and circular economy

Data collection complexity

Data collection complexity is a challenge of LCA and a circular economy. An article in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment claims that a system for the verification of LCA results is probably the most relevant challenge to overcome.

Integrating circular principles into traditional construction practices

Striving for a circular economy is making great strides towards more sustainable construction methods. However, becoming mainstream and scalable, which would require integration with traditional construction practices, presents challenges for this approach.

Greater collaboration required

A successful lifecycle assessment and circular economy approach requires a consistent level of commitment from all stakeholders. According to Neuroject, ‘there is a need for greater collaboration and knowledge sharing among stakeholders, including designers, manufacturers, policymakers, and clients, to overcome barriers and promote the use of life cycle assessment in construction’.

Barriers to the use of life cycle assessment can be overcome through greater collaboration and knowledge sharing among designers, manufacturers, decision makers and clients.

Future Trends

It is expected that as the emphasis on sustainability grows, so will the demand for LCA and circular economy thinking.

Proposed future directions include focus on data availability and quality, standardisation of methods, incorporating social aspects and human health impacts, and bridging the gap between LCA research and industry practices.

To create a truly circular economy there also needs to be greater emphasis on material reuse, recycling and designing for deconstruction. According to Circle Economy, just 7.5% of all the materials that flow through the UK’s economy are reused. By adopting more circular solutions in areas like construction, manufacturing and lifestyle, the UK could cut its material use by 40%, while decreasing its carbon footprint by 43%.

In summary...

Centre for Construction Best Practice (CCBP) Membership

CCBP is dedicated to effectively delivering on the three pillars of sustainability: social, economic, and environmental. This involves developing and promoting practices that balance societal needs, economic viability and environmental stewardship, ensuring a sustainable future for the construction industry.

Do you have research to share? Join the CCBP to get involved in our events, research and driving change for a more sustainable built environment.

References

  1. One Click LCA – ‘Carbon Experts Outlook 2024’
  2. Circular Economy – ‘Why the circular economy and LCA make each other stronger’
  3. Ellen Macarthur Foundation – ‘The circular economy in detail’
  4. The University of Manchester – ‘Built on sand: the need for new environmental standards in the construction industry’
  5. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment – ‘The evolution of life cycle assessment in European policies over three decades’
  6. ResearchGate – ‘Life Cycle Assessment of Natural Fiber Polymer Composites’
  7. Circular Economy Foundation – ‘The Circularity Gap Report